Skip to content

How Did the Jafar Express Incident Who Planned It?

Jafar Express incident photo by GNN

How Did the Jafar Express Incident Happen in Balochistan?

The Jafar Express incident occurred on March 11, 2025, when the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), a Baloch ethnonationalist group, hijacked the Jafar Express, a passenger train traveling from Quetta to Peshawar. The attackers executed a well-coordinated assault by detonating explosives in tunnels and on the train tracks, forcing the train to halt in a mountainous region. This disruption took place in the rugged terrain of the Bolan Pass area, near Tunnel No. 8, which complicated immediate access for rescue operations. After stopping the train, which was carrying approximately 380 to 450 passengers (depending on the source), the BLA insurgents opened fire, initiating a hostage crisis. Their objective was to leverage the situation to demand the release of Baloch political prisoners, issuing a 48-hour ultimatum and threatening to execute hostages if their demands were unmet.

Who Planned It and Where Did It Happen?

  • Who Planned It?
    The hijacking was planned and executed by the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), a militant group advocating for Baloch independence and control over the region’s natural resources. The BLA has a history of targeting Pakistani security forces and infrastructure as part of its insurgency, which dates back to the early 2000s.
  • Where Did It Happen?
    The incident took place in the Bolan Pass area of Balochistan, a mountainous region in southwestern Pakistan. Specifically, it occurred near Tunnel No. 8, a strategic location that enhanced the attackers’ ability to isolate the train and delay response efforts due to the difficult terrain.

Who Were the People Involved Behind It?

The primary group responsible was the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA). The BLA comprises Baloch ethnonationalists who view their actions as resistance against perceived exploitation by the Pakistani state. During the hijacking, 33 BLA insurgents were directly involved in the attack, executing the operation on the ground. They aimed to secure the release of Baloch political prisoners, activists, and individuals they claimed were forcibly disappeared by Pakistani authorities. The BLA’s leadership and operational hierarchy remain shadowy, but this incident aligns with their broader campaign of insurgency in Balochistan.

How Was the Operation Completed?

The Pakistani government responded swiftly by launching Operation Green Bolan, a military effort led by the Pakistan Armed Forces to rescue the hostages and neutralize the threat. The operation unfolded over March 11-12, 2025, and involved multiple raids on the hijacked train. The challenging mountainous terrain of the Bolan Pass added complexity to the mission, requiring precise coordination. By the end of the operation:

Resolution: The immediate threat was neutralized, and the hostages were liberated, though the high casualty toll underscored the intensity of the confrontation.

Outcome: The military successfully freed 354 hostages and killed all 33 BLA insurgents involved in the hijacking.

Casualties: The operation resulted in significant losses, with 18 soldiers killed, 33 attackers eliminated, and 38 others (including both military personnel and civilians) injured.

Who Were the People Behind the People Involved in This Incident?

  • Who Were Behind the BLA?
    Pakistani officials, including military spokespersons, have accused Afghanistan and India of providing support to the BLA, suggesting that the hijacking was part of a broader geopolitical strategy to destabilize Pakistan. These allegations point to external backing in the form of funding, training, or logistical assistance, though both Afghanistan and India have officially denied any involvement. The BLA operates within a network of insurgent groups in Balochistan, but specific individuals or entities behind its leadership remain unidentified in public reports.
  • Were All of Them Caught?
    During Operation Green Bolan, all 33 BLA insurgents directly involved in the hijacking were killed, effectively eliminating the on-site perpetrators. However, it is unclear whether the broader network of planners, supporters, or leaders within the BLA—or any alleged external backers—were apprehended. The operation focused on rescuing hostages and neutralizing the immediate threat, leaving open questions about the capture of higher-level operatives or facilitators.

What Are the Updates on This Incident Till Date?

  • Operation Completion: Operation Green Bolan concluded on March 12, 2025, with the rescue of 354 hostages and the elimination of the 33 BLA insurgents. The immediate crisis was resolved, but the incident left a lasting impact.
  • Casualties and Aftermath: The operation resulted in 18 soldiers and 33 attackers killed, with 38 others injured, highlighting the scale of the confrontation.
  • Protests: Post-incident, tensions escalated in Balochistan. The BYC, led by Mahrang Baloch, organized ongoing protests in Quetta, accusing security forces of excessive force during a crackdown on March 22, 2025. These demonstrations reflect broader unrest over human rights and governance in the region.
  • Government Response: The Pakistani government and military condemned the attack, labeling it an act of terrorism. In response, Pakistan Railways enhanced security measures, including increased patrols, passenger and vehicle inspections, and the deployment of surveillance drones and CCTV to monitor railway systems.
  • Ongoing Tensions: The incident has deepened the divide between Baloch activists and the Pakistani state, with the BLA’s demands unmet and protests continuing. Allegations of external support from Afghanistan and India remain unproven but fuel diplomatic friction.

The Jafar Express incident highlights the persistent insurgency in Balochistan, driven by local grievances over resource control and allegations of state repression. The region’s stability remains precarious, with the interplay of militant groups, human rights movements, and geopolitical interests shaping its future.

Was India and Afghanistan Involved in This Incident?

Pakistan has consistently accused India of supporting the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), including in the Jafar Express hijacking that took place in the Bolan Pass area near Tunnel No. 8. The Pakistani narrative frames India’s alleged involvement as part of a broader strategy to destabilize Pakistan by backing separatist movements in Balochistan. Specifically:

  • Pakistani Claims: Pakistani military officials, such as Lt. Gen. Ahmad Sharif Chaudhry, have asserted that the hijacking was “orchestrated and directed by terrorist ring leaders” with external support, explicitly naming India as the “main sponsor.” They allege that India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) provides funding, training, and logistical assistance to the BLA.
  • Evidence: Despite these accusations, Pakistan has not presented conclusive, publicly verifiable evidence to substantiate India’s direct involvement in the Jafar Express incident. Past claims, such as the 2016 arrest of alleged Indian spy Kulbhushan Jadhav in Balochistan, have been cited as proof of Indian interference, but independent analysts and India have dismissed these as inconclusive or fabricated.

Afghanistan’s role in the Jafar Express incident is tied to its history as a sanctuary for BLA operatives, a dynamic that Pakistan claims facilitated the attack:

  • Pakistani Claims: During the hijacking, Pakistani authorities reported that the attackers communicated with “handlers in Afghanistan” via walkie-talkies, suggesting that the operation was coordinated from Afghan soil. Pakistan asserts that southern Afghanistan, particularly Kandahar Province, serves as a base for BLA leaders and fighters.
  • Historical Context: This aligns with past incidents, such as the 2018 killing of BLA leader Aslam Baloch in Kandahar, which confirmed the group’s presence in Afghanistan. The porous Pak-Afghan border has long enabled cross-border movement of militants.
  • Evidence: While Afghanistan’s role as a safe haven is plausible, direct evidence of Afghan government involvement or active support for the Jafar Express hijacking is lacking. The Taliban’s takeover in 2021 adds complexity—some analysts suggest the Taliban may tolerate BLA activities as leverage against Pakistan, but this remains speculative.

Who Funds the BLA?

The funding of the BLA is a murky and multifaceted issue, with no single source fully documented. Below are the primary possibilities based on available information:

  • Baloch Diaspora:
    The Baloch diaspora in Europe (e.g., UK, Sweden), North America, and Gulf states is widely believed to provide financial support. This funding often flows through remittances or donations to organizations sympathetic to the separatist cause. Events like fundraising campaigns or protests abroad may also contribute.
  • External State Actors:
    • India: As noted, Pakistan accuses India of funding the BLA, potentially through intelligence channels like RAW. However, no financial trails or concrete transactions have been publicly disclosed to confirm this.
    • Afghanistan: Historical ties suggest possible past support, but current funding from Afghanistan is uncertain, especially under Taliban rule.
    • Iran: Some speculate that Iran, which faces its own Baloch insurgency (e.g., Jaish ul-Adl), might indirectly influence BLA activities to manage regional dynamics, though evidence is anecdotal.
    • Other Nations: Theories about Gulf states or Western countries supporting the BLA as a counterweight to Pakistan’s alignment with China (e.g., CPEC projects) exist but lack substantiation.
  • Local Sources:
    The BLA likely extracts funds from within Balochistan through extortion or “taxation” of local businesses, particularly those in resource sectors like coal mining or gas exploration. Balochistan’s resource wealth, contrasted with its poverty, fuels grievances that the BLA exploits for support.
  • Criminal Activities:
    Insurgent groups often rely on illicit revenue streams, and the BLA may engage in smuggling (e.g., drugs, arms) across the Pak-Afghan-Iran border triangle. Kidnapping for ransom, a tactic used by other Baloch groups, could also contribute.
  • Scale and Transparency:
    The BLA’s operations, including the sophisticated nature of the Jafar Express hijacking, suggest a steady funding stream, but exact amounts and sources remain opaque. Estimates are speculative due to the group’s clandestine nature and Pakistan’s limited success in disrupting its finances.

Conclusion on Funding

The BLA’s funding is likely a mix of diaspora contributions, local extortion, and possibly external aid, with India and Afghanistan as alleged but unproven state sponsors. The lack of transparency makes it a persistent challenge for counterinsurgency efforts.

Where Can BLA Hideouts Be Located or From Where Do They Operate?

The BLA leverages the geography and political instability of the region to maintain its operational bases:

  • Balochistan, Pakistan:
    • Terrain: Balochistan’s rugged mountains, deserts, and sparse population provide ideal hideouts. The Bolan Pass, site of the Jafar Express hijacking, exemplifies this—a narrow, difficult-to-monitor area surrounded by steep cliffs.
    • Key Areas: Districts like Awaran, Kech, and Dera Bugti are known hotspots for BLA activity due to their remoteness and sympathetic local populations.
    • Tactics: The BLA uses caves, small villages, and mobile camps to evade Pakistani forces, often blending into civilian areas.
  • Afghanistan:
    • Southern Provinces: Kandahar, Helmand, and Nimroz are cited as BLA strongholds, benefiting from proximity to Balochistan and weak governance. The 2018 killing of Aslam Baloch in Kandahar highlighted this presence.
    • Border Dynamics: The 2,600-km Durand Line is porous, with minimal fencing and tribal networks facilitating cross-border movement.
    • Post-Taliban Context: Since 2021, the Taliban’s control has raised questions about whether they tolerate or suppress BLA activities—evidence suggests the former, given their strained ties with Pakistan.
  • Iran (Potential):
    • The Sistan-Baluchistan region, bordering Pakistan, hosts Baloch populations and insurgent activity (e.g., Jaish ul-Adl). While less documented, some BLA fighters may use this area for refuge or transit, though Iran’s own security concerns limit this.

Operational Patterns

The BLA launches attacks from these hideouts, retreating to safe zones after operations like the Jafar Express hijacking. Their mobility and knowledge of the terrain give them an edge over Pakistani forces, who struggle with intelligence and logistics in these areas.

Who Else Can Be Associated with the BLA?

The BLA operates within a broader ecosystem of groups, individuals, and sympathizers:

  • Other Separatist Groups:
    • Baloch Liberation Front (BLF): Focuses on guerrilla attacks, often overlapping with BLA objectives.
    • Baloch Republican Army (BRA): Led by figures like Brahumdagh Bugti (in exile), it shares the BLA’s separatist goals and may collaborate tactically.
    • Coordination: While these groups have distinct leadership, joint operations or resource-sharing are plausible.
  • Baloch Diaspora:
    Expatriates in the UK (e.g., Hyrbyair Marri, a prominent separatist leader), U.S., and Gulf states amplify the BLA’s cause through advocacy, funding, and propaganda. Marri, for instance, is accused by Pakistan of directing BLA activities from London.
  • Human Rights Activists:
    • Mahrang Baloch: A leader of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC), she has campaigned against enforced disappearances and led protests after the Jafar Express incident. Pakistan alleges ties to the BLA, but she denies involvement in militancy.
    • BYC: The group’s activism intersects with BLA grievances, though no direct operational link is proven.
  • External Actors:
    • India and Afghanistan: As alleged sponsors (see above).
    • NGOs or Fronts: Some Pakistani officials claim Western NGOs or Baloch-run organizations abroad act as conduits for BLA support, though evidence is thin.

Network Complexity

The BLA’s associations range from armed allies to ideological supporters, creating a diffuse but resilient movement. Distinguishing between active participants and passive sympathizers remains a challenge.

Was Some Baloch Politicians or Leaders Involved in This Incident?

Direct Involvement

No specific Baloch politicians or leaders have been conclusively linked to planning or executing the Jafar Express hijacking. The operation was carried out by BLA fighters, with leadership attributed to shadowy figures like Bashir Zeb, a known BLA commander, rather than political elites.

Indirect Associations

  • Mahrang Baloch:
    • Role: Following the hijacking, she organized protests highlighting civilian grievances and alleged military abuses. Pakistani authorities arrested her, claiming she had “contacts with overseas handlers” and ties to the BLA.
    • Evidence: These accusations rely on circumstantial links (e.g., her activism aligning with BLA narratives).
    • Bebarg Baloch:
    • Role: Another BYC leader arrested post-incident, accused of supporting protests that indirectly aided BLA morale.
  • Exiled Leaders:
    • Hyrbyair Marri: Based in the UK, he leads the Free Balochistan Movement and is accused by Pakistan of masterminding BLA attacks, including possibly the Jafar Express incident.
    • Brahumdagh Bugti: Head of the BRA, living in Switzerland, he advocates separatism.

Political Context

Balochistan’s political landscape includes nationalist parties (e.g., Balochistan National Party) and tribal leaders, some of whom sympathize with separatist goals. However, their involvement in specific BLA operations like the Jafar Express incident is unproven and likely limited to rhetoric rather than action.

Conclusion on Involvement

While activists like Mahrang Baloch and exiled figures like Hyrbyair Marri face accusations, there is no definitive evidence tying them or other Baloch politicians to the hijacking. The BLA’s operational core appears distinct from the political sphere.

Final Summary

  • India and Afghanistan: India’s involvement is alleged but unproven Afghanistan’s role as a safe haven is more substantiated, though not necessarily active.
  • Funding: The BLA likely relies on diaspora support, local extortion, and possibly external aid.
  • Hideouts: Operations stem from Balochistan’s rugged terrain and southern Afghanistan, with Iran as a minor possibility.
  • Associations: The BLA connects to other separatist groups, diaspora networks, and activists, forming a broad but loosely defined coalition.
  • Politicians/Leaders: No direct involvement is confirmed; figures like Mahrang Baloch are linked circumstantially but not operationally.

Read another Article The art of forensic science! solving crimes

Real-time Exchange Rates Get up-to-date currency conversion rates

Najeeb Alam

Najeeb Alam

Technical writer specializes in developer, Blogging and Online Journalism. I have been working in this field for the last 20 years.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *